|
|
Dear Alan,
Welcome to Autumn! We have many exciting things
happening
around the office, and we can't wait for you to
check them all
out. Due to popular demand, we have purchased a
second foot
bath. Patients have been amazed at how much
toxins come
out of their systems with each foot bath. Come see
for
yourself, and since we have two, get a friend to try
it with you!
With the addition of the new foot bath, we decided
to do a little
remodeling along with it. The new and improved, very
relaxing
foot bath room is coming soon! Be sure to check it
out!
Speaking of new additions, we now would like to
formally
introduce two newcomers to our office. Dr. Craig
Johnson is a graduate from Logan Chiropractic. He is
certified in
acupuncture, pediatrics, and pregnancy. Dr. Johnson has
great hands and a gentle heart as well as a very good sense
of humor. He is married and has two children with a third on
the way. We look forward to
seeing all of the gifts he has to offer to each of you. Dr.
Johnson will allow us to expand our hours to serve you better
than ever. He will also allow us to offer a prompt service
each and every time you come in the office. Immediate
service on every visit is now available. Secondly,
we would like to welcome Nicole Argent to the office.
She has
taken over Krissy's job, and although we will miss
Krissy, we
are excited to see what perspectives and insights
she will
provide to our team. You can expect smiling, friendly
faces and
a great sense of humor from both our newcomers, so
if you
haven't had the pleasure of meeting them, please
come in and
do so!
Just a Reminder...Dr. Olson will be out of the
office the week of October 9th. Dr. Craig Johnson will
be filling in and he would be happy to continue your
regiments while Dr. O is away, so feel free to
schedule during that week. Dr. Olson will return the
following Monday, October 16th.
More News...The office will be closed
October 26th and 27th due to a conference that
everyone in the office will attend. You may contact
Dr. Melissa Smith at 314-882-4646 if you need
assistance during those two days. We will return to
normal business hours on Monday, October 30th.
 |
 |
 |
"O" zone
The real cost of drugs.
The True cost of drugs! What is it? You decide. I think
there are a couple of points that must be considered.
1. Drugs do help some people. How many do they really
help, and how many do they really hurt?
2. From last weeks news we hear about the death of
Anna Nicole Smith's 20-year-old son Daniel was caused by a
lethal combination of methadone, Zoloft and Lexapro,
according to pathologist Cyril Wecht. He was taking three
common medications. The combination of the medications
are completely unstudied. We should always be careful with
taking more than one medication at a time.
3. Consider the following thoughts from a former Drug
company executive: “Prescription drugs have no consumer or
client. A 'normal consumer' is someone who selects, pays for
and consumes a product. In [America] and other parts of the
world, Rx drugs are selected by one person (the doctor) paid
for by another (society) and consumed by a third (the patient
or consumer). The dynamics of pharmaceutical economics
are a totally irrational contradiction of supply/demand logic.
Patients cannot choose or influence their own consumption or
choose a brand between equal products. Nor can the patient
influence the price, which has been fixed by negotiations
between industry and the authorities. The patient generally
does not actually care, either, since he or she is not paying.
This dysfunction amongst market forces is the 'normal'
business logic for the pharmaceuticals industry. They don’t
have to please a client, nor does the user need to care how
much the product cost. That is a recipe for high prices.
4. Then let’s look at the notion that drugs treat
conditions and not humans. We have our life experiences
which results in physiological reactions. When we don’t like
our physiology, we take drugs to change the effects. Let me
use an example. When we are under chronic stress, our
body secretes excess cortisol. This has many effects. A
couple of them are, increased blood flow to our muscles and
bones and a decreased blood flow to our vital internal
organs, like our lungs, kidneys, liver and heart. The longer
we are under stress, the less the nutrient rich blood nurtures
the organs and the more toxins accumulate in our vital
organs. The greater the toxicity, the less the oxygen and the
more the poison that remains in the vital organs. They begin
to get old, dry and less flexible. As the organ tissues age
rapidly, the body craves a solution. One possible solution is
to increase the blood pressure to allow more blood into the
organs so the nutrient can be delivered and the toxins can be
removed. As our blood pressure goes up, instead of dealing
with underlying cause, the stress, we visit the Medical
practitioner who simply gives a drug that lowers the blood
pressure and denies the body's heroic attempt to salvage a
higher level of health. Ouch. We have defeated an age old
attempt of the body to regain vital function by creating a
common adaptation. By treating a condition instead of a
person we actually defeat a potential life saving adaptation
and normalize the blood pressure at the expense of the vital
organs.
5. This is a letter to the Mercola web site: Thanks to
Anne Boone for sharing the following information with us!__It
pays to shop around. This helps to solve the mystery as to
why there appears to be a Walgreen's on every
corner..................__On Monday night, Steve Wilson, an
investigative reporter for Channel 7 News in Detroit, did a
story on generic drug price gouging by pharmacies. He found
in his investigation, that some of these generic drugs were
marked up as much as 3,000% or more. Yes, that's not a
typo..... three thousand percent!__So often, we blame the
drug companies for the high cost of drugs and, usually,
rightfully so. But perhaps, the fault clearly lies with the
pharmacies themselves. For example, if you had to buy a
prescription drug, and bought the name brand, you might pay
$100 for 100 pills. The pharmacist might tell you that if you
get the generic equivalent, they would only cost $80, making
you think you are "saving" $20 What the pharmacist is not
telling you is that those 100 generic pills may have only cost
him $10!__At the end of the report, one of the anchors asked
Mr. Wilson whether or not there were any pharmacies that
did not adhere to this practice, and he said that Costco
consistently charged little over their cost for the generic
drugs.__I went to the Costco site, where you can look up any
drug, and get its online price. It says that the in-store prices
are consistent with the online prices. I was appalled! Just to
give you one example, from my own experience, I had to use
the drug, Compazine, which helps prevent nausea in chemo
patients. I used the generic equivalent, which cost $54.99 for
60 pills at CVS.__I checked the price at Costco, and I could
have bought 100 pills for $19.89 For 145 of my pain pills, I
paid $72.57 I could have gotten 150 at Costco for $28.08 I
would like to mention, that although Costco is a
"membership" type store, you do NOT have to be a member
to buy prescriptions there, as it is a federally regulated
substance. You just tell them at the door that you wish to use
the pharmacy, and they will let you in.__I am asking each of
you to please help me by copying this letter, and pasting it
into your own e-mail, and sending it to everyone you know
with an e-mail address. Let's support change at the
grassroots!
6. The predicted danger in taking Pharmaceuticals is
probably the greatest cost. The tragedy of Vioxx, the drug
that killed over 56,000 people from heart attacks, is now
followed by a cousin drig that seems to be just as dangerous:
Arcoxia. Be extra wary of medications. Estimates are that
over 100,000 people and as many as 175,000 die per year
from expected side effects of medications. The benefits we
receive are indeed a high cost; 175,000 lives.
Medications can be life saving, and they can be life
stealing. Preserve your good health. Honor your potential
by choosing to exercise, eat well and get the help you need
to keep your spine aligned and your energy system balanced.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Yuck! That is in my milk?
Organic Milk Is Better, Expert Says
by Samuel S. Epstein, M.D.
Organic milk is very different, and safer than milk
from cows
injected with rBGH, a highly potent genetically
engineered
version of BGH, the natural bovine growth hormone.
Manufactured by Monsanto, rBGH is sold to dairy
farmers
under the trade name Posilac. Injection of this
hormone
forces cows to increase their milk production by
about 10
percent. However, this is of little or no benefit in
view of the
current national surplus. Monsanto has stated that
about one-
third of dairy cows in the nation are in large herds
where the
hormone is now used. rBGH factory farms now pose a
major
threat to the viability of small organic dairy farms,
and
enriches Monsanto without any benefits to
consumers.
Monsanto, strongly supported by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), still insists that hormonal milk is
indistinguishable from natural milk, and that it is safe.
This is
blatantly false, according to Epstein, who claims:
rBGH makes cows sick. Monsanto has been forced to
admit
to about 20 toxic effects, including mastitis, on its
Posilac
drug label.
rBGH milk is often contaminated with pus, due to
mastitis
commonly induced by rBGH, and also with antibiotics
used to
treat the mastitis. This poses risks of nationwide
antibiotic
resistance to life threatening infections.
rBGH milk is chemically, and nutritionally different
than
natural milk. These differences include increased
levels of
milk fat, posing cardiovascular risks.
Milk from cows injected with rBGH is contaminated
with the
hormone, traces of which are absorbed through the
gut into
the blood, and provoke foreign antibodies.
rBGH milk is supercharged with high levels of a
natural
growth factor (IGF-1), which is readily absorbed
through the
gut. These levels are further increased following
pasteurization.
In numerous published scientific studies over the last
two
decades, excess levels of IGF-1 have been
incriminated as
causes of breast, colon, and prostate cancers.
IGF-1 blocks natural defense mechanisms, technically
known
as apoptosis, against the growth of early
submicroscopic
cancers.
Based on such well-documented scientific evidence,
a 1999
European Commission Report, by a group of well
recognized
international experts, concluded that avoidance of
rBGH dairy
products in favor of natural organic products "would
appear
to be the most practical and immediate dietary
intervention
to . . . achieve the goal of preventing cancer."
Warnings of
these risks were detailed in my 1996 publication in
the
prestigious International Journal of Health Services,
endorsed
by over 50 leading national and international
independent
experts in cancer prevention and public health,
besides by
activist consumer groups, and in my 2006 book
What's In
Your Milk?
Based on such scientific evidence, Canada, 28
European
Member States, Norway, Switzerland, New Zealand,
and
Japan have all banned the use and import of U.S.
rBGH milk
and dairy products.
In sharp contrast, the FDA continues to turn a blind
eye to
the dangers of Monsanto's hormonal milk. This
indifference
has been supported by longstanding conflicts of
interest
between Monsanto and the White House, the
American
Medical Association, and the American Cancer
Society, which
still remain unrecognized by the media. Also
unrecognized
have been Congressional expressions of concern.
These
include a 1990 charge by Congressman John Conyers,
then
Chair of the House Committee on Government
Operations. "I
find it reprehensible that Monsanto and the FDA have
chosen
to suppress and manipulate animal health test data in
efforts
to approve commercial use of rBGH . . . without
regard to
the adverse effects on humans."
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Better Re-Think the Soft Drink
Sugar Linked with Mental Problems in Norway Study
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Oslo teens who drank the most
sugary soft drinks also had more mental health problems such
as hyperactivity and distress, Norwegian reseachers reported
on Tuesday.
Their study of more than 5,000 Norwegian 15- and 16-year olds
showed a clear and direct association between soft drink intake
and hyperactivity, and a more complex link with other mental
and behavioral disorders.
They surveyed the students, asking them how many fizzy soft
drinks with sugar they had a day, and then questions from a
standard questionnaire used to assess mental health.
The teens who reported skipping breakfast and lunch were
among the heaviest soft drink consumers, Dr. Lars Lien and
colleagues as the University of Oslo found.
"There was also a strong association between soft drink
consumption and mental health problems among Oslo 10th
graders," they wrote in their report, publishe in the American
Journal of Public Health.
"This association remained significant after adjustment for
social, behavioral and food-related disorders."
Most of the students said they drank between one and six
servings of soft drinks per week.
Those who drank no soft drinks at all were more likely than
moderate drinkers to have mental health symptoms, the
researchers said. But those who drank the most--more than six
servings a week-had the highest scores.
For hyperactivity, there was a direct linear relationship--the
more sodas a teen drank, the most symptoms of hyperactivity
he or she had.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Short Steps to Better Health
Four Short Walks Keep BP in Check
NEW YORK - In adults at risk of developing high blood
pressure, or hypertension, a series of shorter bursts of
activity may be more effective in keeping blood pressure in
check than a single long exercise session, according to a
study.
After four 10-minute sessions on a treadmill, spaced an hour
apart, people's blood pressures were reduced for three and
four hours longer than after a single 40-minute workout, Dr.
Saejong Park of Indiana University in Bloomington and
colleagues found.
"Results of our study indicate that as few as four 10-minute
sessions per day is effective in reducing blood pressure in
prehypertension," Park and his team conclude in a report in
the Journal of Hypertension.
Prehypertension occurs when a person's blood pressure is
above normal but does not meet the definition of
hypertension. For these individuals, 30 minutes of
"moderately intense" exercise on most days of the week is
the only currently recommended treatment.
To compare the effectiveness of several smaller exercise
sessions or a single longer workout, the researchers had 20
people perform the four shorter exercise sessions and then,
a week later, a single longer one, or vice versa.
After the single, longer workout, participants' systolic and
diastolic blood pressures were reduced for 7 hours.
But after the series of shorter sessions, systolic blood
pressure (the top number in a blood pressure reading) stayed
low for 11 hours, and the diastolic pressure remained low for
10 hours.
The shorter workouts compared to the single longer workout
may have done a better job of restoring the balance of the
nerves that control how blood pressure responds to daily
demands, the researchers suggest.
SOURCE: Journal of Hypertension, September 2006.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
A Heart to Heart
Fish Oil May Save More Lives Than Defibrillators
NEW YORK - Fish oil could potentially save more lives than
difibrillators, devices used to revive individuals whose hearts
have stopped beating and to prevent and treat life-
threatening heart arrhythmias, researchers estimate in a new
report.
Past research has linked the omega-3 fatty acids found in
oily fish to a lower risk of fatal heart rhythm disturbances.
This latest study tried to estimate the potential public health
impact of raising adults' omega-3 levels with fish oil
supplements.
Using a computer-simulated community of 100,000
Americans and data from past medical studies, the
researchers calculated that raising omega-3 levels would
save 58 lives each year.
This amounts to a 6.4 percent total death reduction-mostly
by preventing sudden cardiac death in people, according to
the study authors, led by Dr. Thomas E. Kottke of the Heart
Center at Regions Hospital in St. Paul, Minn.
Conversely, the researchers estimate that far fewer lives
would be saved by difibrillators, devices that deliver a
"shock" to restart the heart to resolve ventricular fibrillation,
an otherwise fatal heartbeat irregularity in which the heart
quivers instead of contracting normally.
For example, the study found, even if automated external
defirbrillators (AEDs) were available in every home and
public area, the devices would lower a community's annual
death rate by less than 1 percent.
AEDs are portable devices that can be used by lay people to
shock someone in cardiac arrest. They are frequently
available in public places such as large stores or on
airplanes. Though the devices do save lives, the researchers
note that AEDs would make little difference in the overall
rate of sudden cardiac death.
Kottke's team estimates that implantable defibrillators would
lower the cardiac death rate by 3.3 percent, still not as much
as the 6.6 percent lower death rate achieved by increasing
the use of fish oil supplements.
Though the implantable devices are effective, the
researchers point out that about half of adults who die
suddenly from cardiac arrest have no warning signs
beforehand-and would, therefore, never be candidates for an
implanted defibrillator.
The study, which published in the American Journal of
Preventative Medicine, has its limitations, as a computer
simulation. Though the researchers based their estimates of
fish oil benefits on two large studies, it's not yet clear that
omega-3 fatty acids prevent sudden cardiac death in
apparently healthy people.
Ongoing trials in Italy and England may help answer this
question, Kottke and his colleagues note.
If fish oil is as effective against fatal heart arrhythmias as
evidence suggests, the researchers conclude, it would have
more widespread benefits than either AEDs or implanted
defibrillators.
SOURCE: American Journal of Preventative Medicine,
October 2006
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Product Spotlight
IntraMAX
Speaking of Nutritional Health....Have you heard about
IntraMAX???
IntraMAX is 100% vegetarian and 100% natural. This super
supplement contains over 415 essential, organic,
microcomplexed nutrients in each bottle. It is ultra-
hypoallergenic and is a clinically proven, health promoting,
organic, nutritional supplement.
TOP REASONS DOCTORS BELIEVE IN INTRAMAX
1. IntraMAX contains over 415 nutrients, ALL IN ONE
2. Replaces ALL other supplements
3. Provides Optimum Daily Allowance (O.D.A.) of all essential
nutrients
4. Maximizes energy, strength, stamina, and vitality
5. Helps fight off colds, flus, allergies, and disease
6. Boosts immune system and balances the body
7. Reduces scars, maintains skin moisture, and tightens skin
8. Reduces "free-radical" damage for anti-aging
9. Promotes healthy blood and bones
10. Removes heavy metals and harmful toxins
11. Naturally anti-viral, anti-bacterial, anti-parasitic, and
anti-
fungal.
12. Improves concentration and memory span
IntraMAX does NOT contain: preservatives, colloids, fat,
cholesterol, wheat, gluten, caffeine, corn, yeast, rice flour,
peanuts, nuts, soy, dairy, fish or fish oil, animal products,
artificial additives, artificial colors, artificial flavors, fillers,
pesticides, herbicides, antibiotics (drugs), chemicals, starch,
binders, coatings, excipients, or flow agents.
Cost: $60 plus tax
Stop by the office and pick
some up today. You're health can't wait!
|
 |
Sincerely,
|
|